Rashidun
Nahavand, The Victory of Victories
The battle that broke the Sasanian field army, c. 21 AH
c. 21 AH / 642 CE
Educational historical reconstructionWhere
Nahavand, the Zagros highlands of Media (al-Jibal)
34.1885, 48.3768 · View on OpenStreetMap
Background
After the great victory at al-Qadisiyyah, the fall of the Sasanian capital at Ctesiphon, and the further defeat at Jalula, the Sasanian emperor Yazdegerd III withdrew into the Iranian highlands and worked to raise one more great army to throw the Arab Muslims back out of Iraq. The marzbans, the military governors of the Persian provinces, assembled their levies at Nahavand, a town in the Zagros mountains of the old province of Media, south of Hamadan on the western edge of the Iranian plateau. The early Muslim historians report a very large Persian host, gathered from across the highlands and strongly entrenched in the broken mountain ground; the figures they give (often around a hundred and fifty thousand) are certainly exaggerated, but the sources agree the Persians far outnumbered the Muslim army and held fortified positions. The Caliph 'Umar ibn al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), directing the war from Madinah, appointed al-Nu'man ibn Muqarrin al-Muzani (may Allah be pleased with him) to command the Muslim force of perhaps thirty thousand. Finding the Persians unwilling to leave their fortifications, the Muslims used a stratagem the sources record: a feigned withdrawal that drew the Persian army out of its entrenchments onto open ground, where the lighter and more mobile Arab cavalry could turn and engage it. In the fighting al-Nu'man (may Allah be pleased with him) was struck down; according to the tradition he asked only that his death be kept from the army until the battle was won, and the banner passed, by his own instruction, to Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman (may Allah be pleased with him), who completed the victory. The Sasanian army was destroyed and its rich camp and treasure taken. The Muslims called the day the Fath al-Futuh, the Victory of Victories, because it broke the organised field resistance of the Persian empire for good: after Nahavand Yazdegerd III could never again assemble a great army, his governors were defeated one by one, and the conquest of the whole Iranian plateau followed. The exact year is given variously in the early sources, most placing it around 21 AH / 642 CE. This scene depicts the battle in its highland pass: a fortified position of dry-stone walls and archers in the foreground, the two hosts locked together in the dust of the defile below, and the opulent Sasanian baggage spilled across the stony ground. In keeping with the project's ethics no Companion is shown by likeness and the figures are anonymous and at a distance.
What you see
Dry, tawny mountains under a high sun, a broad pass opening between bare ridges of folded rock with only thin scrub on the slopes. This is highland country, the western ranges of the Iranian plateau, the Zagros of the old province of Media, far above and east of the flat alluvial plains of lower Iraq where the earlier battles of the conquest were fought.
On the high ground in the foreground a dry-stone breastwork has been thrown up across the lip of the pass, piled from the loose rock of the hillside, and behind it stand archers with a dark banner raised above them. The fighting is for a fortified position in the heights, not an open plain: the defenders have walled and entrenched the approaches.
Down in the dust of the defile two armies are locked together, horse and foot crowded into the narrow ground between the hills, standards swaying above the press and a haze of dust and grit hanging over the whole engagement. The terrain funnels the battle into the throat of the pass.
In the foreground, spilled across the stony ground among abandoned gear, lances, wicker shields and camp baskets, lies a great length of deep crimson-and-gold cloth, the rich figured textile of a Sasanian camp. The opulent baggage and treasure of the Persian host is a remembered feature of this battle, the spoils that fell to the victors.
The host holding the heights is the imperial army of Sasanian Persia, the levies of the marzbans of the highland provinces gathered for a last stand; the force pressing up the pass against them is a lighter Arab Muslim army out of Iraq, its banners plain and without figures. The clash is between the last field army of an ancient empire and the armies of the young caliphate.
This is the field where the organised field resistance of the Sasanian empire was finally broken. After it the Persian emperor never again put a great army into the field; his marzbans were beaten one by one and the whole Iranian plateau, province by province, lay open to the conquest.
The Muslims remembered this day as the Fath al-Futuh, the Victory of Victories. It was fought in the caliphate of 'Umar ibn al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), about the twenty-first year after the Hijrah; the Muslim commander al-Nu'man ibn Muqarrin (may Allah be pleased with him) was struck down in the hour of victory and the banner passed, by his own instruction, to Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman (may Allah be pleased with him).
Primary sources
al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa-al-Muluk (early 10th c.): Principal early Arabic source for the conquest of Persia. Provides the narrative of Nahavand: the Persian assembly under the marzbans, the appointment of al-Nu'man ibn Muqarrin (RA) by 'Umar (RA), the feigned-withdrawal stratagem, the death of al-Nu'man and the passing of the banner, and the dating around 21 AH.
al-Baladhuri, Futuh al-Buldan (9th c.): Standard early Arabic geographical-conquest history. Used for the campaign into the highlands, the scale of the Persian host, the spoils of the Sasanian camp, and the strategic consequences for the conquest of the Iranian plateau.
Ibn al-Athir, al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh (early 13th c.): Synthesises the earlier Arabic accounts into a continuous narrative. Used for the sequence of the battle and the succession of command from al-Nu'man ibn Muqarrin (RA) to Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman (RA).
Ibn Kathir, al-Bidaya wa-al-Nihaya (14th c.): Later Sunni historical synthesis. Used for the 'Fath al-Futuh' designation, the martyrdom narrative of al-Nu'man (RA), and the placing of the battle within the conquests of 'Umar's caliphate.
Further reading & cross-references
al-Dinawari, al-Akhbar al-Tiwal (9th c.): Early Arabic general history with particular attention to the Persian side. Used as a complementary source for the Sasanian assembly and command and for the highland setting of the battle.
Fred M. Donner, The Early Islamic Conquests (Princeton, 1981): Standard modern academic treatment of the early conquests. Used for the chronology debate (the sources variously give 18-21 AH), the organisation and likely real scale of the armies, and the strategic significance of Nahavand in the collapse of Sasanian resistance.
Surviving topography of Nahavand and the Zagros (Hamadan province, Iran): The town of Nahavand persists in the highlands of western Iran and the mountainous Zagros terrain is unchanged. The exact site of the battlefield is not precisely fixed by the sources; the coordinate anchors on Nahavand itself in the old province of al-Jibal (Media).
Guess places like this in GeoSiyer
Drop into a 360° scene from Islamic history and pin where — and when — it happened.
Play GeoSiyer