Buyid
The Buyids Take Power in Baghdad
The caliph becomes a figurehead, 334 AH
Jumada I 334 AH / 945 CE
Educational historical reconstructionWhere
Baghdad, a palace terrace on the Tigris
33.3400, 44.4000 · View on OpenStreetMap
Background
In Jumada I 334 AH (945 CE) the Abbasid caliphate, already long in decline, passed under the control of the Buyids, and the caliph was reduced for the first time to an almost purely ceremonial figure in his own capital. The Buyids (or Buwayhids) were a dynasty of Daylamite soldiers from the highlands of northern Iran, of Shi'i allegiance, who had carved out power across western Iran and now, under Ahmad ibn Buya, marched on Baghdad and entered the city, making themselves masters of it. The reigning caliph al-Mustakfi granted Ahmad the honorific Mu'izz al-Dawla and the office of amir al-umara, the commander of commanders, and from then on it was the Buyid amir, with his Daylami and Turkish soldiery, not the caliph, who governed; within weeks Mu'izz al-Dawla deposed and blinded al-Mustakfi and raised al-Muti' in his place, a plain demonstration of where power now lay. What makes the arrangement striking is that the Buyids, though Shi'i, kept the Sunni Abbasid caliph in place rather than abolishing the caliphate: his name was still read in the Friday sermon and struck on the coinage, his investiture still legitimised rulers across the Sunni world, but he had no army and no treasury of his own. Real power, taxation, and appointment lay with the Buyid commander and his secretaries. This division between a revered but powerless caliph and a soldier who actually ruled would last over a century, until the Sunni Seljuks took Baghdad in 447 AH and restored the caliph's dignity while keeping the substance of power themselves. The period is recorded by the contemporary administrator-historian Miskawayh in his Tajarib al-Umam, and by the later Sunni historians Ibn al-Athir (al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh) and Ibn Kathir (al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya), who place the Buyid entry firmly in 334 AH. This scene depicts that moment by the Tigris: a council and audience held on a palace terrace above the river, with the armoured soldiery of the new overlord drawn up at its side, the clerks and registers of the diwan carrying on their work, and the caliph present only by way of his palace and his name, no longer as a ruler enthroned. The framing is careful and non-partisan: this is a constitutional eclipse, the separation of the caliph's sacred office from the soldier's actual rule.
What you see
A raised palace terrace looks out across a broad river crowded with shipping, and a flat, low city skyline rises along the far bank. This is the Tigris at Baghdad, the Abbasid capital, with a date palm standing at the water's edge.
The terrace is enclosed by an arcade of slender columns with carved capitals and a pierced stone balustrade, with a deep vaulted recess behind hung with green cloth. The brick, carved stucco, and round arches are Abbasid Iraqi work, not the pointed arches and domes of a later age.
At the centre, men in robes and turbans sit on the ground around a single low circular table set with vessels and papers. The gathering is a council and audience held in the open air of the palace, not a formal enthronement on a raised dais.
A file of armoured soldiers stands at the side of the terrace, helmeted and bearing round shields and spears. Their presence at the very seat of the court is the sign of the moment: the men of the army now stand over the business of the state.
The soldiers are highland foot, lightly armoured spearmen of the kind the Daylam of northern Iran were famous for. They are the muscle of a new military overlord who has just entered the city and made himself master of it.
Papers and reckoning vessels lie on the table while clerks attend. The chancery and the registers of the diwan carry on as before, but they now serve a commander who holds the army rather than the caliph who holds only his name.
The caliph himself is nowhere on the terrace as a ruler enthroned: his palace and his river remain, but authority has passed to the soldier. The Abbasid caliph is kept as the revered head of the faith, named in the Friday sermon and struck on the coins, while a Daylami amir now governs.
Primary sources
Ibn al-Athir, al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh (early 13th c.): Sunni historical synthesis. Consolidates the narrative of the Buyid entry into Baghdad in 334 AH, the granting of the title amir al-umara, and the reduction of the caliph. Confidence high.
Ibn Kathir, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya (14th c.): Sunni historical chronicle. Records the Buyid entry into Baghdad in 334 AH and the deposition and blinding of al-Mustakfi in favour of al-Muti'. Confidence high.
al-Dhahabi, Tarikh al-Islam (14th c.): Major Sunni historical compendium. Used for the dating and the standing of the caliphs under Buyid control. Confidence high.
Further reading & cross-references
Miskawayh, Tajarib al-Umam (late 10th c.): Near-contemporary Sunni administrator-historian who served the Buyid court. The principal source for the Buyid takeover of Baghdad and the workings of the amir al-umara system. Confidence high; close to the events.
John J. Donohue, The Buwayhid Dynasty in Iraq (modern): Modern non-confessional academic study. Used for the institution of the amir al-umara, the relationship between the Buyid amirs and the caliphs, and the administration of the period. Confidence high.
Hugh Kennedy, The Prophet and the Age of the Caliphates (modern): Non-confessional synthesis. Used for the broader decline of the Abbasid caliphate and the meaning of the Buyid eclipse of caliphal power. Confidence high.
Guess places like this in GeoSiyer
Drop into a 360° scene from Islamic history and pin where — and when — it happened.
Play GeoSiyer