Rashidun
The Arbitration at Dumat al-Jandal
The negotiation after Siffin, Ramadan 37 AH
Ramadan 37 AH / February 658 CE
Educational historical reconstructionWhere
Dumat al-Jandal oasis, on the Syrian-Arabian border
29.8128, 39.8717 · View on OpenStreetMap
Background
In the aftermath of the Battle of Siffin (Safar 37 AH / July 657 CE), fought on the upper Euphrates between the army of the Caliph 'Ali ibn Abi Talib (radiyallahu 'anhu) and the army of the governor of al-Sham, Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan (radiyallahu 'anhu), the two parties accepted the proposal of arbitration (tahkim) to resolve their dispute. The agreement was set out in a written document, the kitab al-tahkim, preserved in the Sunni historical tradition (al-Tabari, Ibn Kathir, Ibn al-Athir). Each side named one arbitrator: 'Ali (RA) named Abu Musa al-Ash'ari (radiyallahu 'anhu), Companion of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and former governor of Basra and Kufa; Mu'awiya (RA) named 'Amr ibn al-'As (radiyallahu 'anhu), Companion of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and conqueror of Egypt. The two arbitrators were to be guided in their judgement by the Qur'an and the Sunna of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), and were to meet at a neutral location between Syria and Iraq. They agreed to meet at Dumat al-Jandal, an oasis in the high Syrian-Arabian steppe approximately equidistant from Damascus and Kufa. The arbitration took place in Ramadan 37 AH / February 658 CE, several months after Siffin. The proceedings, the various drafts, and the eventual outcome are preserved in the Sunni historical record; the Sunni position is that both arbitrators were Companions acting in good faith on a political question, and the dispute between 'Ali (RA) and Mu'awiya (RA) was political (over the prosecution of the killers of 'Uthman (RA) and the conditions of allegiance) rather than theological. The arbitration was rejected by a faction within 'Ali's (RA) army who held that referring the dispute to human arbitration was itself unlawful, la hukma illa lillah, 'judgement belongs only to Allah'. This faction became the Khawarij and split off; they would later be subdued by 'Ali (RA) at the Battle of Nahrawan in 38 AH, and the most extreme of them would assassinate 'Ali (RA) in Ramadan 40 AH. This scene depicts a working session of the arbitration at Dumat al-Jandal, with the council tent of the two arbitrators between the camps of the two parties and the ancient fortress of Marid in the middle distance.
What you see
A green oasis set in a circular depression in the open Arabian-Syrian limestone steppe, several days' journey from any major city. Date palms cluster around hidden underground springs at the centre; the high steppe horizons stretch unbroken in every direction beyond.
At the centre of the oasis, the ancient mud-brick fortress of Marid (Qasr Marid) rises on a low rocky outcrop, a strongpoint occupied since pre-Islamic times. Around its foot, the small permanent settlement of the Dumat al-Jandal oasis, dependent on its springs and the date groves.
Two large delegations have pitched their camps at opposite ends of the oasis: one to the north under the dark banners of the army of Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan (radiyallahu 'anhu), governor of al-Sham (Syria); one to the south under the white banner of the army of the Caliph 'Ali ibn Abi Talib (radiyallahu 'anhu), the rightful fourth caliph. Each delegation has come with several hundred attendants, scribes, and witnesses.
Between the two camps, at the centre of the oasis under a large goat-hair council tent erected on level ground near the springs, two figures sit at a low wooden writing-board. They are the two arbitrators (hakaman) named in the Sunni historical sources: Abu Musa al-Ash'ari (radiyallahu 'anhu), Companion of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), representing the side of the Caliph 'Ali (RA); and 'Amr ibn al-'As (radiyallahu 'anhu), Companion of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and conqueror of Egypt, representing the side of Mu'awiya (RA). Both are revered Companions; both are depicted in the scene without identifiable face.
On the writing-board, parchment of the agreed terms is unfolded. The Sunni historical record (al-Tabari, Ibn Kathir, Ibn al-Athir) preserves the text of the kitab al-tahkim, the document of arbitration, agreed in the aftermath of the Battle of Siffin (Safar 37 AH / July 657 CE) by which the two parties referred their dispute to two arbitrators to be guided by the Book of Allah and the Sunna of His Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him).
The scene is grave and quiet. The Sunni position on the dispute between 'Ali (RA) and Mu'awiya (RA) is the same as on the Battle of the Camel: both were Companions doing ijtihad; the dispute was a calamity; we hold our tongues and love them both. The arbitration was the attempt of both parties to resolve the matter peacefully, the path the Sunni sources record as the right path the principals were both seeking.
The light is the strong winter sun of the high Syrian-Arabian steppe. The month in the Arabic calendar is Ramadan of the thirty-seventh year after the Hijrah, corresponding to February 658 CE. The proceedings would extend over a number of days; the scene depicts a working session under the council tent at mid-process.
The proceedings of the arbitration are preserved in detail by al-Tabari on the authority of Abu Mikhnaf, in Ibn Kathir's al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, and in Ibn al-Athir. The Sunni historical position is that the dispute was political, not theological, neither party challenged the foundations of Islam, and both arbitrators acted as Companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in good faith.
Primary sources
al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa-al-Muluk (early 10th c.): The principal early Sunni historical narrative of Siffin and the arbitration. Preserves the text of the kitab al-tahkim, the names of the arbitrators, the proceedings, and the outcomes.
Ibn Kathir, al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya (14th c.): Standard major Sunni history. Synthesises the historical record with the Sunni theological framing, both 'Ali (RA) and Mu'awiya (RA) revered, the arbitrators revered, the dispute political rather than theological.
Ibn al-Athir, al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh: Sunni historical synthesis. Used for the broader chronology of Siffin, the arbitration, and the subsequent events including the emergence of the Khawarij.
al-Dhahabi, Tarikh al-Islam and Siyar A'lam al-Nubala': Major Sunni historian and hadith critic. His biographical entries on 'Ali (RA), Mu'awiya (RA), Abu Musa al-Ash'ari (RA), and 'Amr ibn al-'As (RA) preserve the events with isnad evaluation and the unambiguous reverence of all four as among the major Companions.
Imam Abu Ja'far al-Tahawi, al-'Aqida al-Tahawiyya: Standard Sunni creed. The doctrinal framework for how the disputes between the Companions are to be understood: kaff (restraint), love for all of them, refusal to disparage any of them.
Further reading & cross-references
Ibn Taymiyya, Minhaj al-Sunna al-Nabawiyya: Major Sunni theological work. Treats the dispute of 'Ali (RA) and Mu'awiya (RA) at length within the Sunni doctrinal framework.
Surviving fabric of Qasr Marid at Dumat al-Jandal (extant): The pre-Islamic fortress of Marid survives at the heart of the modern town of Dumat al-Jandal (now usually called al-Jawf) in northern Saudi Arabia. The architectural form depicted in the scene is reconstructive against the standing fabric.
Guess places like this in GeoSiyer
Drop into a 360° scene from Islamic history and pin where — and when — it happened.
Play GeoSiyer