Nations & States
Lines on the Map: Sykes-Picot and Balfour
The secret partition of the Arab lands, 1916-1917
1334-1336 AH / 1916-1917 CE
Educational historical reconstructionWhere
The Levant (Bilad al-Sham), partitioned from afar
33.5000, 36.3000 · View on OpenStreetMap
Background
While Arab forces fought the Ottomans on British promises of independence, the powers were secretly deciding the fate of the Arab lands among themselves. In 1916 the British and French governments, with Russian assent, concluded the agreement named after their negotiators Mark Sykes and Francois Georges-Picot, which divided the Ottoman provinces of the Mashriq, the Fertile Crescent, into British and French zones of direct rule and influence, drawing the first of the lines that would become the borders of the modern states. In 1917 the British government issued the Balfour Declaration, a single short sentence pledging support for the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, a land whose population was then overwhelmingly Arab. These two commitments flatly contradicted the promise of Arab independence, and after the war they were translated into the League of Nations mandates that placed Syria and Lebanon under France and Iraq, Transjordan and Palestine under Britain, with frontiers largely ruled from outside. In the memory of the Arab and wider Muslim world, the secret partition and the Balfour Declaration are remembered as a foundational betrayal: independence promised and withheld, a region cut up by foreign hands, and the planting of a conflict over Palestine that has not ended. This scene depicts the act in its truest form, not a battlefield but a map table, the coast and hinterland of the Levant with boundary lines ruled across it, the dividers and documents of a partition decided from afar.
What you see
The scene is a map room: a large map of the eastern Mediterranean coast and its hinterland spread on a table, lit by a lamp, with no battlefield in sight. The decision is being made on paper, far from the land it concerns.
Straight boundary lines have been ruled across the map in coloured pencil, cutting through provinces, deserts and peoples with a ruler's edge rather than following any river, mountain or community.
Dividers, a ruler and official documents in European languages lie on the table, the instruments of diplomats and surveyors carving territory at a distance.
A separate typed declaration, only a sentence or two long, sets out support for a national home in one of the territories on the map, a short text with consequences out of all proportion to its length.
Foreign hands drawing borders across the Arab lands by secret agreement, while those lands' own people had been promised independence, marks the carving-up of the Ottoman Mashriq into mandates and the origin of much of the modern map and its conflicts.
Further reading & cross-references
The texts of the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916) and the Balfour Declaration (1917): The documents themselves, later published; the primary evidence of the partition and the declaration. Confidence high.
George Antonius, The Arab Awakening (1938): The classic account of the contradiction between the promises to the Arabs and the secret agreements, from the Arab perspective. Confidence high for that framing.
James Barr, A Line in the Sand (2011): Standard modern study of the Anglo-French partition of the Middle East. Used for the agreement, the mandates and the drawing of borders. Confidence high.
Rashid Khalidi, The Hundred Years' War on Palestine (2020): Used for the Palestinian and Arab reading of the Balfour Declaration and its long consequences. Confidence high for that perspective.
Guess places like this in GeoSiyer
Drop into a 360° scene from Islamic history and pin where — and when — it happened.
Play GeoSiyer